Warning: Constant ABSPATH already defined in /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-config.php on line 22 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-config.php:22) in /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1648 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-config.php:22) in /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1648 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-config.php:22) in /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1648 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-config.php:22) in /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1648 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-config.php:22) in /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1648 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-config.php:22) in /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1648 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-config.php:22) in /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1648 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-config.php:22) in /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1648 {"id":3125,"date":"2009-03-22T16:50:04","date_gmt":"2009-03-22T15:50:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/konsumenter.se\/blogg\/?p=3125"},"modified":"2009-03-22T16:50:04","modified_gmt":"2009-03-22T15:50:04","slug":"vem-vinner-pa-pensionslotteriet","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/konsumenter.se\/blogg\/?p=3125","title":{"rendered":"Vem vinner p\u00e5 pensionslotteriet?"},"content":{"rendered":"
N\u00e4r det nya pensionssystemet f\u00f6rst presenterades var min f\u00f6rsta reaktion – vilken hit f\u00f6r fondm\u00e4klarna och n\u00e4ringslivet! Nya friska pengar att spela med! Jag har skrivit det f\u00f6rut, vi \u00e4r tvungna att spela p\u00e5 b\u00f6rsen med v\u00e5ra pensionspengar.<\/p>\n
Bankerna \u00e4r de enda vinnarna p\u00e5 premiepensionssystemet, skriver TT och publiceras<\/a> i flera<\/a> tidningar<\/a>. Trots d\u00e5lig f\u00f6rvaltning har fondbolagen h\u00e4mtat hem runt \u00e5tta miljarder kronor sedan starten.<\/p>\n Hush\u00e5llens PPM-besparingar har i snitt krympt med 0,8 procent \u00e5rligen sedan de f\u00f6rsta inbetalningarna gjordes 1995. Som j\u00e4mf\u00f6relse har avkastningen i det allm\u00e4nna inkomstpensionssystemet, som pengarna annars hade legat i, varit plus 3,5 procent \u00e5rligen.<\/p>\n Totalt har svenskarna pumpat in 264 miljarder kronor i systemet. V\u00e4rdet vid senaste \u00e5rsskiftet l\u00e5g p\u00e5 231 miljarder kronor, allts\u00e5 ett minus p\u00e5 33 miljarder kronor.<\/p>\n F\u00f6rklaringen till minussiffrorna \u00e4r f\u00f6rst\u00e5s de gigantiska b\u00f6rsrasen det senaste dryga \u00e5ret, men \u00e4ven den usla inledningen p\u00e5 2000-talet gr\u00f6pte h\u00e5l i besparingarna.<\/p>\n Men att b\u00f6rsen faller och kapitalet krymper bryr sig inte fondf\u00f6rvaltarna om. De plockar ut miljarder i avgifter fr\u00e5n spararnas konton i alla fall. Bara i fjol uppgick fondernas avgifter till cirka 2,6 miljarder kronor. Men efter det att PPM tvingat fram rabatter m\u00e5ste fonderna betala tillbaka 1,2 miljarder till spararna som \u00e5terf\u00f6rs \u00e5ret d\u00e4rp\u00e5. Ovanp\u00e5 det tar PPM ut avgifter p\u00e5 drygt 400 miljoner kronor per \u00e5r f\u00f6r att t\u00e4cka sin verksamhet.<\/p>\n Summa avgifter i fjol blev 1,8 miljarder kronor. Under 2006 och 2007 var motsvarande avgifter lite drygt 1,9 miljarder respektive 1,7 miljarder kronor, och sedan starten 2000 \u00f6ver tio miljarder kronor, varav bankerna har kammat hem runt \u00e5tta miljarder, enligt TT:s ber\u00e4kningar.<\/p>\n Det \u00e4r de nuvarande regeringspartierna och Socialdemokraterna som st\u00e5r bakom det nuvarande pensionssystemet. \u00c4r de stolta? Tycker de fortfarande att vi ska delta i ett lotteri, och betala direkt\u00f6rernas bonusar, med v\u00e5ra pensionspengar?<\/p>\n Andra bloggar om: Pensioner<\/a>, PPM<\/a>, Spel<\/a>, Dobbel<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" N\u00e4r det nya pensionssystemet f\u00f6rst presenterades var min f\u00f6rsta reaktion – vilken hit f\u00f6r fondm\u00e4klarna och n\u00e4ringslivet! Nya friska pengar att spela med! Jag har skrivit det f\u00f6rut, vi \u00e4r tvungna att spela p\u00e5 b\u00f6rsen med v\u00e5ra pensionspengar. Bankerna \u00e4r de enda vinnarna p\u00e5 premiepensionssystemet, skriver TT och publiceras i flera tidningar. Trots d\u00e5lig f\u00f6rvaltning […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[73,44],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/konsumenter.se\/blogg\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3125"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/konsumenter.se\/blogg\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/konsumenter.se\/blogg\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/konsumenter.se\/blogg\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/konsumenter.se\/blogg\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3125"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/konsumenter.se\/blogg\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3125\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3127,"href":"http:\/\/konsumenter.se\/blogg\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3125\/revisions\/3127"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/konsumenter.se\/blogg\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3125"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/konsumenter.se\/blogg\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3125"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/konsumenter.se\/blogg\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3125"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}