Warning: Constant ABSPATH already defined in /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-config.php on line 22 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-config.php:22) in /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1648 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-config.php:22) in /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1648 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-config.php:22) in /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1648 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-config.php:22) in /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1648 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-config.php:22) in /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1648 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-config.php:22) in /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1648 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-config.php:22) in /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1648 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-config.php:22) in /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1648 {"id":4838,"date":"2009-11-17T08:18:56","date_gmt":"2009-11-17T07:18:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/konsumenter.se\/blogg\/?p=4838"},"modified":"2009-11-17T08:18:56","modified_gmt":"2009-11-17T07:18:56","slug":"sms-laneforetag-fallt-i-md","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/konsumenter.se\/blogg\/?p=4838","title":{"rendered":"Sms-l\u00e5nef\u00f6retag f\u00e4llt i MD"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sms-l\u00e5n tillh\u00f6r mina hatobjekt<\/a>, jag anser dem vara en modern form av ocker. D\u00e4rf\u00f6r ser jag med gl\u00e4dje n\u00e4r denna avart dras inf\u00f6r r\u00e4tta f\u00f6r sina otroligt h\u00f6ga \u201davgifter\u201d, som i sj\u00e4lva verket \u00e4r maskerade r\u00e4ntor. Nu kommer Konsumentverket med ett ganska f\u00f6rvirrande pressmeddelande<\/a> om den senaste domen. Vill ni veta mer rekommenderar jag i st\u00e4llet en TT-artikel som publiceras<\/a> i flera tidningar<\/a>.<\/p>\n

I det h\u00e4r fallet \u00e4r det l\u00e5nef\u00f6retaget Ferratum Sweden AB som g\u00e5tt p\u00e5 pumpen i Marknadsdomstolen. I en v\u00e4gledande dom f\u00f6rbjuds f\u00f6retaget att ta ut avgifter som inte motsvaras av faktiska kostnader f\u00f6r det enskilda l\u00e5net.<\/p>\n

Ferratum f\u00e5r inte ta ut avgifter f\u00f6r marknadsf\u00f6ring, kreditf\u00f6rluster, kontorslokaler och uppl\u00e5ning, skriver TT. Bolaget har inte heller r\u00e4tt att ta ut avgifter f\u00f6r f\u00f6ljande kostnader-om de inte direkt \u00e4r en kostnad f\u00f6r en specifik kredit; personal, sms, telefoni, data\u00f6verf\u00f6ring, kreditpr\u00f6vning samt fakturering.<\/p>\n

Ferratum f\u00f6rbjuds vid ett vite av 750.000 kronor att anv\u00e4nda dagens avtalsvillkor.<\/p>\n

– Det inneb\u00e4r f\u00f6rst\u00e5s att en st\u00f6rre del av f\u00f6retagets kostnader m\u00e5ste finansieras p\u00e5 annat s\u00e4tt som sponsring, annonsering eller att r\u00e4nta tas ut p\u00e5 l\u00e5nen, s\u00e4ger Gunnar Wikstr\u00f6m, jurist p\u00e5 Konsumentverket, till TT.<\/p>\n

Domen inneb\u00e4r allts\u00e5 att ms-l\u00e5nef\u00f6retagen ska redovisa en stor del av sina kostnader som r\u00e4nta, eller dra in pengarna p\u00e5 andra v\u00e4gar. Vi f\u00e5r v\u00e4l se om de lyckas slingra sig ur detta.<\/p>\n

Andra bloggar om: ikrol\u00e5n<\/a>, Sms-l\u00e5n<\/a>, Snabbl\u00e5n<\/a>, Ferratum<\/a>, Marknadsdomstolen<\/a>, MD<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"