Warning: Constant ABSPATH already defined in /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-config.php on line 22 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-config.php:22) in /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1648 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-config.php:22) in /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1648 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-config.php:22) in /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1648 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-config.php:22) in /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1648 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-config.php:22) in /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1648 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-config.php:22) in /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1648 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-config.php:22) in /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1648 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-config.php:22) in /customers/8/4/0/konsumenter.se/httpd.www/blogg/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1648 {"id":927,"date":"2008-03-30T05:34:32","date_gmt":"2008-03-30T04:34:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/konsumenter.se\/blogg\/?p=927"},"modified":"2009-07-17T17:31:55","modified_gmt":"2009-07-17T15:31:55","slug":"tvattmedel-testade","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/konsumenter.se\/blogg\/?p=927","title":{"rendered":"Tv\u00e4ttmedel testade"},"content":{"rendered":"

Tv\u00e4tttrumma<\/a> Testfakta l\u00e4t forskningsbolaget Swerea IVF laboratorietesta<\/a> nio vanliga m\u00e4rken. B\u00e5de den reng\u00f6rande och den f\u00e4rgbevarande f\u00f6rm\u00e5gan sattes p\u00e5 prov, skriver Testfakta i en artikel som publiceras<\/a> i flera<\/a> tidningar<\/a>.<\/p>\n

B\u00e4st i test totalt sett blev Willys tv\u00e4ttmedel, med Nopa och Skona hack i h\u00e4l. B\u00e4st p\u00e5 att reng\u00f6ra var Skona som fick h\u00f6gsta betyg, en femma, medan Willys, Nopa och Ariel var b\u00e4st p\u00e5 att bevara f\u00e4rgen.<\/p>\n

S\u00e4mst p\u00e5 att ta bort fl\u00e4ckar var n\u00e5got f\u00f6rv\u00e5nande de mer k\u00e4nda m\u00e4rkena, Ariel och Via. Det \u00e4r framf\u00f6r allt en viss fl\u00e4cktyp som de tv\u00e5 har sv\u00e5rt att r\u00e5 p\u00e5.<\/p>\n

– Alla tv\u00e4ttmedel klarade sig bra, men Ariel och Via har sv\u00e5rast f\u00f6r hudfett och pigment. D\u00e4r \u00e4r de s\u00e4mst av de provade tv\u00e4ttmedlen, s\u00e4ger Ann Stare, testansvarig p\u00e5 Swerea IVF.<\/p>\n

Det d\u00e5liga resultatet i fl\u00e4cktestet punkterar Ariels reklambudskap ”Ingen tar bort fl\u00e4ckar b\u00e4ttre \u00e4n Ariel”, medan Vias ”Smuts \u00e4r bra” kan f\u00e5 st\u00e5 oemotsagt.<\/p>\n

Andra bloggar om: Tv\u00e4ttmedel<\/a>, Test<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Testfakta l\u00e4t forskningsbolaget Swerea IVF laboratorietesta nio vanliga m\u00e4rken. B\u00e5de den reng\u00f6rande och den f\u00e4rgbevarande f\u00f6rm\u00e5gan sattes p\u00e5 prov, skriver Testfakta i en artikel som publiceras i flera tidningar. B\u00e4st i test totalt sett blev Willys tv\u00e4ttmedel, med Nopa och Skona hack i h\u00e4l. B\u00e4st p\u00e5 att reng\u00f6ra var Skona som fick h\u00f6gsta betyg, en […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[71,55,81],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/konsumenter.se\/blogg\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/927"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/konsumenter.se\/blogg\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/konsumenter.se\/blogg\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/konsumenter.se\/blogg\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/konsumenter.se\/blogg\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=927"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/konsumenter.se\/blogg\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/927\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4038,"href":"https:\/\/konsumenter.se\/blogg\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/927\/revisions\/4038"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/konsumenter.se\/blogg\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=927"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/konsumenter.se\/blogg\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=927"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/konsumenter.se\/blogg\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=927"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}